Wednesday, 13 January 2016

'Most ridiculous cricket I've ever seen' - Chris Gayle panned for turning down easy single

The Melbourne Renegades have kept their Big Bash League finals hopes alive with a thrilling five-wicket win over the Sydney Thunder but it was Chris Gayle in the limelight yet again for all the wrong reasons.

A week after being condemned for his inappropriate interview with broadcaster Mel McLaughlin, the West Indian was left blushing after inexplicably failing take an easy single at Spotless Stadium on Monday night.

After smashing it to long on, Gayle turned back his batting partner Tom Cooper in an ordinary display which was slammed on social media and by the commentators.

Even Cooper was seemingly unimpressed, saying: "it wasn't a good bit of cricket" on the Channel 10 broadcast.

In commentary, former Australian captain Ricky Ponting was not amused.

"This is the most unbelievable, ridiculous cricket I've ever seen," he said.

"Sometimes in cricket and in life you get what you deserve, and he got what he deserved there.

"What sort of message does that send to the boys on the sideline?"

Mark Waugh was equally as perplexed.

"We can't work it out so you'd have to ask him why he didn't take the single."

To make matters worse, Gayle was dismissed by Clint McKay the next ball, throwing his wicket away after his flying start of 28 off 20 balls.

Despite Gayle copping a barrage of criticism over the last week, White described the Caribbean big-hitter and self-styled "world boss" as a good teammate and defended his decision not to run when an easy single looked on offer.

"He probably thought he hit it straight to him, that's why he didn't run," White said.

"He probably hasn't got the number of runs that he would have liked but he gets us off to a [good] start, we're 10-an-over off the first three overs and that's so underrated, the momentum shifts straight away.

"If you asked him as well, he'd be looking for that explosive 100 off 50 balls but what he does do is get the momentum rolling."

Thunder captain Hussey also said he understood Gayle's rationale and he was attempting to control the strike and backing his ability to hit big.

"I understood what he was trying to do, he was trying to take advantage of the power play and that's what he's there for," Hussey said.

"He generally does it extremely well so he obviously lined up that bowler and thought he could get him.

"Fortunately for us it went our way but on another day he could have hit the next ball for six."

After the Thunder posted 173-5, the Renegades snuck over the line after stellar innings from Dwayne Bravo (47 off 24) and Cameron White (61 off 46).

The win elevated the Renegades to six points, level with the Thunder with just one game remaining and sets up a thrilling final round of fixtures.

There were a few tense moments in the final overs after Bravo and White were both dismissed by Andrew Russell in the 18th over but Peter Nevill and Ben McDermott showed cool heads to guide their side over the line with four balls to spare.

Earlier the home side looked headed for victory after half centuries from Usman Khawaja and Shane Watson helped them post an imposing total.

Khawaja's golden summer continued when he fired a sublime 62 in a 42-ball knock that included nine fours and one six.

He smashed the Renegades bowlers to all corners of the park as his impressive purple patch continued.

Since November, he's scored four centuries and two half centuries in his seven innings in all forms of the game.

Watson, who also hit 62, was strong in the middle order and showed he still had plenty to offer following his test retirement.

The Thunder have several injury woes with Andre Russell nursing a sore collarbone after being hit by a Nathan Rimmington short ball during his dismissal in which he hit his wicket.

South African allrounder Jacques Kallis left the ground during the Renegades' run chase with a hamstring strain.

For More Information,Visit us on :-

'Still not convinced about DRS' - Dhoni

MS Dhoni, India's limited-overs captain and a staunch cynic in DRS matters, has offered yet another trenchant defence of his stance. Just like in the first international of their last summer in Australia, India could, if DRS was in place, have easily overturned a critical decision that went against them.

In a chase of 310, Australia were 2 for 21 when George Bailey gloved the first ball he faced down the leg side, but was reprieved by umpire Richard Kettleborough. Bailey went on to a score a hundred that helped turned the chase into a stroll, and later didn't shy away from cheeky gamesmanship. "Would've been interesting to see on DRS, but we're not the team that doesn't want it," he said.

When the question was put to the team that doesn't want it, Dhoni retorted: "Are you indirectly saying we are not getting decisions in our favour because we don't use DRS?"

When told that that was not the case, Dhoni repeated his general mistrust of the umpires' role in DRS. Responding to how a review of the Bailey decision could have changed the course of the match, Dhoni said: "It could have but at the same time we need to push the umpires to make the right decisions. You have to see how many 50-50 decisions don't go in our favour. It always happens, then you have to take it. But I am still not convinced about DRS."

Asked whether he felt his team tended to get penalised by the umpires for not agreeing to use DRS, Dhoni said, "I may agree with you. I may agree with you. That's what…" And then he didn't complete the thought.

When asked if the team was united in its opposition of the DRS, Dhoni didn't answer that question, but did offer a slightly more nuanced explanation for his stance. "First DRS should ideally be the decision-making system," he said. "If you see the deviations in DRS, there are quite a few deviations. Even the makers agree that can happen. Now you have to also take into account whether it was given not out or out. If it was given out it needs to touch the stump [for the decision to remain out]; if it was not out it needs to hit half the stump [to be given out]. That itself makes the variable too big. In cricket every inch, every millimetre, matters.

"DRS should not be the umpires' decision justification system. It should be giving the right decision. Like in tennis you don't say the umpire called it out and half the ball has to pitch inside the line. It has to be plain and simple. You don't have to keep too many things in consideration. You either say, 'This is DRS, doesn't matter whether it is given out or not out, if half the ball is hitting the stumps, you are out.' Irrespective of the decision. Now, for example, you take DRS, in an lbw decision, what changes everything is whether it was given in favour or not. It can mean a margin of one inch overall, and that is very big."

This is, at its best, a limited understanding of the nature of decisions made in tennis and cricket. Tennis only adjudicates on what has happened, not what would have happened. The lbw decision is unique to cricket. It deals with what would have happened, which is the reason for a margin for error. At its worst, however, this is a deeply cynical view of the umpiring machinery. ESPN cricinfo spoke to a few other players over the course of the last year, and they expressed similar feelings that what shows up as "umpire's call" in DRS will tend to go against them, and DRS will be used only to justify it.

Shashank Manohar, India's new board president, also the ICC chairman, had earlier stood by India's opposition of DRS on tenuous grounds as well. "Instead of the umpire imagining the bounce and the direction of the trajectory, it is the person sitting behind the camera who is going into the DRS," he said in a Facebook interaction with the fans. "He is going to have his imagination put in the place of the umpire's imagination with regard to the bounce."

For More Information,Visit us on :-

Hastings to cover for resting Mitchell Marsh

Mitchell Marsh's elevated place in Australia's plans has been underlined by the national selectors' decision to rest him from the second ODI against India in Brisbane in order to give him an extra day's rest at home in Perth.

While Marsh played only a limited role in Australia's Test summer, his participation in all six Tests left the panel to conclude he needed some rest amid limited-overs assignments that prelude February's tour of New Zealand. The Victorian John Hastings has been duly requisitioned from the Melbourne Stars Big Bash League side to be part of the ODI squad in Brisbane.

"Mitch is a tremendous asset to Australian cricket and we are conscious of managing his workload and his travel, especially with so much cricket to come during the rest of this summer and beyond," the selection chairman Rod Marsh said. "By taking this decision we have opted to give him an extra day at home in Perth after match one, before he flies to Melbourne on Thursday to prepare for Sunday's third match of the series.

"In John Hastings we have a high-quality replacement, a player who has been in excellent form for the Melbourne Stars in the ongoing BBL. John also showed his quality with a match-winning spell of 3 for 21 in the decisive one-day international of the series against England in Manchester in September, so we know what he can do if called upon.

"At this stage John will be with the squad only for game two but should we suffer any injuries to our bowlers in either Perth or Brisbane then we may look at retaining his services for longer."

Hastings will thus miss the Stars' next BBL match against the Brisbane Heat in Melbourne on Thursday, before likely returning in time for their final qualifying match ahead of the tournament finals.

For More Information,Visit us on :-

Pakistan coach Waqar Younis backs comebacks for Salman Butt, Mohammad Asif

Pakistan’s national cricket coach Waqar Younis has backed an international comeback for convicted spot-fixers Salman Butt and Mohammad Asif , saying that they should not be treated any differently from the rehabilitated Mohammad Amir.

“The way I see it if Butt and Asif perform well in their comeback in domestic cricket why can’t they be considered for a second chance to play international cricket? All the three did the same wrong and also underwent the same punishment so why should they be treated differently,” Waqar told ‘Geo News’.

Butt scored a hundred in his first competitive match in five and half years on Sunday in the national one-day championship while Asif took two wickets to leave an impact on the same day Amir left with the national team for New Zealand.

Waqar’s support for Butt and Asif to be treated equally as Amir is in contrast to recent statements of Pakistan Cricket Board Chairman Shaharyar Khan and national T20 captain Shahid Afridi who have said the duo’s case differs from Amir and it will not be easy for them to make a comeback.

Afridi went as far as to say that Butt and Asif don’t deserve to be given a second chance like Amir as they had lied for three years and had the audacity to criticise the Pakistan team when they were banned for five years.

“I don’t know what Shahid (Afridi) is thinking maybe he has his reasons but generally I think Butt and Asif deserve same chance as Amir and if they show form and fitness, why not consider them for selection?” Waqar said.

Asked how he had come around to forgiving Amir and accepting him back in the national team, Waqar said he just felt it was time to move on.

“Look we basically cut their hands by banning them from all cricket for five years, it was a strong punishment for what they did. Now that they have served their punishment and appear to have learnt their lesson why shouldn’t they be given a second chance, it could also be good for Pakistan cricket. There has never been any doubt about their cricket abilities,” he said.

For More Information,Visit us on :-

Rohit Sharma Breaks Plethora of Records During First India vs Australia ODI at WACA, Perth

Indian opener Rohit Sharma on Tuesday slammed his ninth century during the Perth ODI against Australia and in the process broke a number of records. Rohit struck an unbeaten 171 off only 163 balls, studded with seven sixes and 13 fours. 

The 28-year-old Rohit looked confident right from the start and mixed caution with aggression. After losing partner Shikhar Dhawan (9) early, Rohit joined forces with Virat Kohli (91) to lift India from a hole.

Sharma and Kohli were involved in India's highest second-wicket partnership against Australia in Australia. The duo stitched together 207 runs for the second wicket, surpassing Sachin Tendulkar-VVS Laxman's 199-run partnership. Overall, this is the fifth-highest partnership for India against Australia in ODIs.

Here are some other records that Rohit created:
# Rohit became the first Indian batsman to score a century at Perth.
# His 171 also broke Viv Richards' unbeaten 153, scored in 1979, to be the highest individual innings in ODIs in Australia against Australia.
# He became the fastest player to complete 1,000 ODI runs against Australia.
# This was also his third century against Australia.

For More Information,Visit us on :-

Friday, 8 January 2016

ICC to collaborate with MIT for uniform decision review system

The International Cricket Council (ICC) has decided to commission one of the world’s leading technology institutes in an effort to achieve a uniform decision review system.
ICC chief executive David Richardson told journalists in Cape Town on Tuesday that the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) has been asked to report by May on the various systems in place around the world.
“In particular they are looking at edge detection and ball tracking,” said Richardson.
“Their findings will be discussed at our meetings in June and the aim is to achieve a uniform system with the agreement of all the Test-playing countries.”
Richardson said the technology issue was one of four priorities for the ICC in 2016.
A major priority is to give context and meaning to bilateral series, in particular Test series.
Richardson has recently started a process of consultations with chief executives from Test-playing countries.
He was due to meet later on Tuesday with the chief executives of South Africa and England during the second Test between the two countries at Newlands.
Richardson stressed that discussions were at an early stage but said his personal view was that a Test league system, possibly with two divisions, could be considered.
The other priorities are to have a successful World Twenty20 tournament in India in March and April and ‘Project USA’ to unlock the potential of cricket in the United States.
“There are more people playing cricket in the USA than Zimbabwe and about as many as New Zealand,” said Richardson.
“There are about 80 leagues but it is very fragmented. The USA Cricket Association is currently suspended from the ICC and we have put in an advisory group in an effort to get cricket on a sound footing in America.”
Richardson revealed that there had been an exploratory meeting with the International Olympic Committee (IOC) to discuss the possibility of cricket being part of the Olympics.
“The IOC would want a proper format of 11-man cricket, such as Twenty20, and they stress that cricket must be united in wanting to be in the Olympics,” said Richardson.
Richardson said the earliest cricket could be in the Olympics would be 2024 but for that to happen there would need to be agreement soon.

For More Information,Visit us on :-

BCCI postpones decision on Chandila, Shah till January 18

A decision on the fate of tainted cricketers Ajit Chandila and Hiken Shah, who have been charged with corruption, was postponed till January 18 by the BCCI’s disciplinary committee after the third accused in the matter, Pakistani umpire Asad Rauf, sought more time to present his case.

Chandila and Shah have already been questioned by the three-member committee, headed by President Shashank Manohar and comprising Jyotiraditya Scindya and Niranjan Shah.

Rauf had been issued a notice by the panel to respond to the allegations against him. The official, who has been charge-sheeted in the spot-fixing case, was declared a “wanted accused” along with 15 bookies from Pakistan.
In the meeting held on January 5, the panel decided to give more time to Rauf to respond.
“The Disciplinary Committee of the Board met today in Mumbai. Mr. Hiken Shah appeared in person, made oral submission and a written reply to the findings of the Enquiry against him. The Committee considered the request of Mr. Asad Rauf to give him more time to respond to the findings of the Enquiry against him,” BCCI said in statement.
“The Disciplinary Committee will meet on Monday, 18th January, 2016 at Cricket Centre,” it added.
Rauf has claimed innocence and has not visited India thereafter ever since the allegations came up against him.
The two players, on the other hand, had earlier met the committee members in person on December 24. The panel had given them time till yesterday to file a written response to the charges of spot-fixing against them.
Chandila was arrested by the police for trying to spot-fix IPL games in 2013 along with Rajasthan Royals teammates S Sreesanth and Ankeet Chavan, both of whom have been banned for life by the BCCI.
Shah, on the other hand, approached one of his colleagues from first-class cricket, who was also a member of one of the IPL teams.
The approached player had reported the matter to his franchise, which passed on the information to the Anti Corruption Unit of the BCCI.

For More Information,Visit us on :-